data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48af7/48af7fb55d69ef8e630b6acccce211c76878eeaf" alt=""
Given that the Evil Land Grab is entirely a Council-level rather than MP-type issue, we asked Roger about the options open to us if the Council behaved illegally. He came up with some sensible suggestions (Secretary of State, Local Government Ombudsman, District Auditor) and a couple of other useful leads.
However, I was taken aback by his views on the covenants. "Twenty-five years experience as an MP... a Council can just say 'Rats!' to a covenant... not worth the paper they're written on...".
Bad attitude, Roger!
I'm disappointed and dismayed to see an elected law-maker wearily accept the spectacle of other elected representatives trampling over covenants. When it comes down to it, even the Law of the land is 'worthless' unless and until it's enforced. The covenants are legally binding, cannot be disregarded, and will be enforced.
.:.
in my experiece most covenants are useless and would not stand up to an appeal
ReplyDeleteHi Don, I'm intrigued. Could you tell me in a nutshell what your experience is? Where and when have you seen covenants so cruelly treated? The awful implication is that for hundreds of years lawyers have been charging decent folk good money to draw up worthless covenants - surely not!
ReplyDelete